- effective tutoring (and therefore effective learning) can only occur if there are clearly defined and measurable learning outcomes (Maharg, 2005)
- any goals are developed in collaboration with the group to ensure specific learning needs are identified (Brookfield, 2001)
- the tutor (and the programme) encourages active learning (Graham et al, 2001)
- ground rules are negotiated to ensure participation and safety of group members (Brookfield, 2001)
- a balance needs to be struck in respect of the quantity and quality of contact time between student-student and student-tutor (Graham et al, 2001)
- perhaps, most fundamentally, the tutor respects the diversity of the student group and thus needs to ensure a flexible and dynamic range of learning opportunities whilst maintaining student-centred, constructive feedback that facilitates achievement of the identified goals and outcomes (Brookfield, 2001; Graham et al, 2001; Maharg, 2005)
If I was being especially brave, I'd base my inventory on Brook and Oliver (2003) as I feel their model - 'presage; process; product' - provides a useful (if somewhat detailed) breakdown of the key aspects in designing a curriculum that is constructively aligned. However, with a suggested limit of 30 lines to present the inventory here, I don't feel I can do this line of argument justice - suffice it to say that I feel the elements I have identified above are addressed in the Brook and Oliver model, just a little more fully! (Further reading and reflection required on my part...)
No comments:
Post a Comment